Tmj Closed Lock Syndrome Management Health And Social Care Essay

Tmj Closed Lock Syndrome foc utilise Health And Social Care EssayTemporo mandibular disorders (TMD) is a collective termination has been defined as a theme of conditions that affect the temporomandibular give voice (TMJ), go across of mastication and associated structures. These disorders are common, affecting at least 30% of the population.1 TMD tummy severely affect individuals daily activities and produce varying symptoms ranging from mild aggravation to severe survive disability. Patients with TMD often presents with reduced mandibular function alternative to increased smart levels, reduced ability in chewing, modified communicate propagateing and during excursive movement of the adjunction.There are many causes of contain mandibular movement, unopen employ is the most common presentation in the clinic. Closed lock is a well recognised condition. An estimated 2% of wad with TMD suffer from a unsympathetic lock. 2 It has been suggested that condylar translation is confine by the chastening of the disc to reduce, with the posterior band being detain anterior to the condylar head. It was too proposed this condition was a result of two-sided restriction in gliding movements of the disc ca utilise by its adherence to the fossa. 3 These separate of patients often complaints of travel to- hypothesis difficulties such as unhinge, restriction and TMJ tightness.Macrotrauma to the structures of the joint through impact or extension injuries, and microtrauma either in the form of clenching or occlusal abnormalities may contributes in the aetiology of internal derangement with closed lock.A various preaching options nurse been considered to improve the symptoms of closed lock. Non- working(a) approaches may populate of anti-inflammatory medications, muscle relaxants, splint therapy, physi another(prenominal)apy, exercise, moist heat, stress management and softish diet or combination of thereof. In patients whom the symptoms turn up refra ctory to non-invasive therapy, surgical management on the TMJ is generally considered.The aim of this dissertation is to discuss and contemplate the published data to support the current management of TMJ closed lock syndrome.Literature ReviewThere are many manipulation modalities in management of TMJ closed lock. The two main approaches used are non-surgical and surgical treatment.Treatment efforts are directed towardReduction of pain using opthalmic Analogue Scale (VAS)Improvement in communicate opening and askant movementImprovement in joint function.For most TMD, clinicians generally score that non-surgical and non invasive care should precede surgery. However, for TMJ closed lock, surgery has been described as preferable. 4Non operative TreatmentA range of conservative treatments including physiotherapy, occlusal seize with teeth splints, NSAIDS, muscle relaxants, stress management and soft diet are available.Minakuchi et al5 conducted a randomized go steadyled evaluati on of non-surgical treatments for closed lock. 232 patients were randomly allocated to one of three group restrict, self-care plus NSAIDs, or occlusal appliance jaw mobilization plus self-care/NSAIDs. The subjects were sight over 2 months period. All three experimental groups had crucial advancement in their signs and symptoms with time. The self-care/ NSAIDs group showed more(prenominal) improvements in the daily activities limitation compared with the other two groups. However, this difference was present only for two reappraisal appointment, and during the stand up review at 8 weeks, there were no significant group difference. These data suggests the gradual improvement in signs and symptoms was non-specific and was not related to the lineament of treatment, but more to the passage of time.Lundh et al 6 carried out a randomized controlled workplace on 51 patients. These patients are hard-boiled with a flat occlusal splint or to serve as an untreated control group. It i s noted that at the end of 12 months period, 16% of patients in control group and 40% of patients treated with splints, the symptoms were worse than at the beginning at the show. In addition, 36% of patients in the control group improved afterwards 1 twelvemonth without treatment. This issue indicates that aggressive treatment modalities should not be used in the initial phase of closed lock. Instead, counselling and nice pain medication seems to be a reasonable treatment approach.Surgical TreatmentSurgery on the temporomandibular joint is generally only considered when non-invasive therapy proved unsuccessful. Closed lock is usually associated with permanent disc displacement, and this condition is often resistant to conservative treatment.The primary role of surgery is physical debridement, remedy and removal of diseased tissue that cause pain and dysfunction at bottom the TMJ. The primary aim of surgery is to reduce the symptoms of pain and to improve joint function of ind ividuals.The historical perspective on temporomandibular surgery dates back to 1887 when Annadale7 account two successful operations to reposition and secure the disc in two patients.CondylectomyIn 1957 Henry and Baldrige8 described the condylectomy operation. They emphasized the preservation of the disc, and limited bone reduction to increase joint space, and relieve irritation to nerve-bearing tissues. Condylectomy was in one case extensive used, but has many disadvantages 9. It often leads to ramus shortening with resultant of malocclusion and mandibular deviation to the side of the surgery.Ward 10 in a review of 21 patients, who he followed for periods of up to three eld, reported a utmost success rate. Banks and MacKenzie 11 in a much larger series of 211 patients reported 91% of them to be cured or improved by surgery. However, in a inspection of patients by Lindahl 12, a high preponderance of persistent pain and dysfunction was still evident.ArthroscopyTemporomandibular joint arthroscopy is a new-fashioned method for the management of acute, subacute, and sometimes chronic limitation of movement of the TMJ. The miniaturised arthroscopy to the TMJ low appeared by Ohnishi 13 in the Japanese literature in 1975. It is used as diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. It has been postulated that it improves limited joint movement by lysis and lavage of fibrotic adhesions, and reductions of surface adherence on articulating joint spaces.Sanders et al 14 conducted 40 arthroscopic procedures on 25 patients during the mid 1980s in management of closed lock. All patients showed improvement and eventually asymptomatic after the procedures. They have good enough range of opening and have little preauricular pain after.Moses et al 15 did a retrospective studies on 237 patient with 419 TMJ joints. 63% of patients reported to have an increase in opening and in these 73% having an interincisal opening of 40mm or greater after 1 year post treatment. 97% of these p atients purview their surgery was successful and 82% stated that would undergo the procedure again. The results of this study appear that the arthroscopic procedure has a definite pass judgment in the treatment of TMJ internal derangement.White et al 16 undertook a similar study on 66 patients with 100 TMJ joints. The overall postoperative increase in maximal incisor opening was 38.4%. 85.7% of the patients rated their postoperative pain and function greatly and fairly improved and 100% of the patients stated they would have the arthroscopic surgery again. However, a failure rate of 7.5% was noted by the objective criteria.Clark et al 17 also reported decreased in mean pain score value by 57%, also an improvement of 67% jaw function in 18 patients after 2 years postarthroscopic surgical treatment.Davis at al 3 evaluated 51 patients, with 80 joints with closed lock that were treated with arthroscopic surgery. Results showed that an immediate improvement after the treatment and fol lowed by a more gradual improvement during the next 6 months, with a plateau in improvement thereafter.Kurita et al 18 also evaluated the correlation between operative utter opening and surgical outcome after arthroscopic surgery. 12 of the 14 patients (86%) showed good reduction in pain and improved range of jaw movement. However, 2 patients showed no improvement after the treatment and require open surgical procedures. The 2 failed cases had 10 and 19mm opening respectively before the treatment. The originator concluded that limitation of mouth opening less than 22mm may be a relative contraindication to arthroscopic treatment. The main disadvantage of this study is that the number of patients in this study is very small.Abd-Ul-Salam et al 19 conducted a retrospective study to investigate the incidence of reoperation after TMJ arthroscopic surgery in 315 consecutive patients (488 patients). He documented a 22% incidence of further surgery arthroscopy or open surgery after TMJ a rthroscopic surgery.ArthrocentesisTMJ arthrocentesis was first described by Nitzan et al 20 in 1991 for the treatment of temporomandibular joint pain and movement restriction.Nitzan et al 20 described this technique as irrigation on the upper joint compartment with Ringers solution. The injected fluid enables the disc to slide and thereby re-establishes normal maximal opening in closed lock. The treatment was shown to be effective, providing significant improvement in maximal mouth opening and lateral movement, and decreased in pain level and disturbance in jaw function involved 17 joints in 17 patients. The overall success rate is 91%. Nitzan et al 21 conducted another study in 1997 on 39 patients with 40 joints with severe closed lock. The overall improvement, as expressed in pain and dysfunction levels, was about 95%, with no recurrence of severe closed lock.A prospective study done by Dimitroulis 22 using the same technique on 46 patients with acute limitation of mouth opening, showed significant improved in pain, jaw opening and function.Hosaka et al 23 evaluated the outcome of arthrocentesis for TMJ with closed lock at a 3 years follow-up in 20 patients. The success rate was 70% at 6 months follow-up and increase to 78.9% over the 3 years of follow-up. The literature showed stable good outcome at 3 years follow-up as compared to 6 months.Alpaslan et al 24 conducted a 5 year retrospective to evaluate the long-term outcome of TMJ arthrocentesis on 34 patients with 48 joints. There was a significant (P 0.001) increase in the maximal mouth opening. Pain and dysfunction levels were significantly (P 0.001) lower than pre-operative values. 26% of patients were pain necessitous and 88% of patients had less pain than before.EminectomyAn alternative surgical approach to the treatment of closed lock of the temporomandibular joint is eminectomy. The surgery involves reduction of the articular greenback of the TMJ, provides greater freedom of movement between th e condyle disc and the reduced articular eminence.Stassen et al 25 conducted a pilot study of the use of eminectomy in the treatment of closed lock in 18 patients. Results show significant increase in mouth opening and a decrease in pain. Both the improvement in inter incisal distance and reduction of symptoms were ensnare to be statistically significant (P